Five Metals in One Oxide Sharpen Ethanol Sensing
A Seoul National University team led by professor Ho Won Jang has built an ethanol gas sensor from a high-entropy oxide mixing indium, tin, iron, zinc and tungsten in a single structure, the group reported in Advanced Science in November 2026. At 50 parts per million of ethanol and 300 degrees Celsius, the sensor's response reached 5,135 percent, 12.6 times the low-entropy oxide it was tested against, with a three-second response time and a calculated detection limit of 4.8 parts per billion.
Mixing five metals in one oxide made the sensor 12.6 times more responsive to ethanol. The catch is heat: it works best at 300 degrees.
A gas sensor's job is to notice a few molecules in a crowd, and a Seoul team has made one far better at it by crowding its own material. Researchers led by professor Ho Won Jang at Seoul National University's Department of Materials Science and Engineering combined five metals, indium, tin, iron, zinc and tungsten, in similar proportions inside a single oxide, and the resulting high-entropy material responded to ethanol 12.6 times more strongly than the simple oxide it was compared with. The findings were published in Advanced Science.
The numbers are the story. Exposed to 50 parts per million of ethanol at 300 degrees Celsius, the high-entropy sensor's response, the change in its electrical resistance, reached 5,135 percent. The low-entropy oxide managed 408 percent, and a medium-entropy version 654 percent, which makes the five-metal material about 7.9 times stronger than the middle option as well. It answered in three seconds, recovered in 73 seconds, and its calculated detection limit was 4.8 parts per billion, a figure the authors derive from the response signal rather than a direct measurement at that concentration.
The mechanism is surface chemistry. Metal-oxide sensors work because oxygen adsorbed on the surface reacts with the target gas and changes the material's resistance. The five-metal oxide carried more adsorbed oxygen and more oxygen vacancies, sites where oxygen atoms are missing from the structure, than the plain oxide. More reaction sites means a bigger signal from the same gas, and the mixed atomic environments created those sites without any coating of gold, platinum or palladium, the noble metals earlier designs leaned on at higher cost and with stability questions.
Durability held up in the lab. The sensor kept its ethanol performance across a six-month stability evaluation and kept working through repeated sensing at 90 percent relative humidity, conditions that defeat many prototype sensors before they leave the bench. Gi Baek Nam and Jin Ho Seo, integrated master's and doctoral students in the department, share first authorship of the paper.
The limits are stated plainly in the work. The sensor's best operating temperature is 300 degrees Celsius, which costs power and complicates any small device. Selectivity, telling ethanol apart from other gases reliably, and tolerance to swinging humidity both need more work before the material belongs in a product. Jang's group says the next step is testing other element combinations aimed at other gases, not just ethanol.
The applications explain the effort. Cheap, sensitive gas sensors are wanted for indoor air-quality monitoring, for watching food condition in storage and transit, and for industrial sites where a leak needs catching early. A design rule that swaps rare-metal coatings for a deliberate mix of common metals is the kind of result other sensor groups can copy this year, which is why a materials paper about one oxide is worth watching beyond its own device.
Sources
The conversation.
Loading comments…

A little more perspective.
Reading is free. Verified members can comment and reply for $2 a month.