$2 / month

Comment and reply across TML.

Start or manage membership

Most pulsed

Advertisement Sinscents Bad Intentions. Great Candles.

Latest from other desks

tml.THE MODERN
LEAP
News / U.S.

Federal Government Awards $10 Billion in Rural Health Grants

Year two of the Rural Health Transformation Fund sends $10 billion to all 50 states, Texas largest at nearly $282 million, against an estimated $137 billion in rural Medicaid losses.

A cardiac catheterization lab. Year two of the fund sends $10 billion across all 50 states. Photo: Echa24161 / CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Summary

The federal government awarded $10 billion to all 50 states in the second year of the Rural Health Transformation Fund, with Texas receiving the largest grant at nearly $282 million.

Tap a passage. React to the part that matters.

Federal officials announced Monday $10 billion in rural health awards to all 50 states, the second year of a five-year, $50 billion fund. [Feds award $10B to states in second year of rural health grants — Stateline, via the Citizen-Times]

The Rural Health Transformation Fund pays $10 billion a year through 2030, and Congress created it to bolster rural care against Medicaid cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Texas took the largest award, almost $282 million. [Feds award $10B to states in second year of rural health grants — Stateline, via the Citizen-Times]

The awards follow homework: all 50 states submitted annual reports documenting their first-year progress, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services says it reviewed those reports in setting this year's amounts. After Texas, the largest grants went to Alaska, Montana, California and Oklahoma. The fund's arithmetic is the argument around it. KFF, the health research organization, estimates rural areas stand to lose about $137 billion from the Medicaid cuts the fund was created to answer, against $50 billion of grants across five years. [Feds award $10B to states in second year of rural health grants — Stateline, via the Citizen-Times]

Rural health leaders quoted in the states' coverage call the money welcome and insufficient in the same breath, and the politics are already moving: Democrats, who won majorities in both chambers in this month's midterms, say they'll push to repeal the underlying law, a repeal that would still need President Trump's signature. The grants themselves are not in dispute in the same way. Every state applied, every state reported, and every state took an award, which is its own measure of how rural systems are budgeting now: take the federal money on offer while arguing about the hole it partly fills. [Feds award $10B to states in second year of rural health grants — Stateline, via the Citizen-Times]

The conversation

A little more perspective.

Reading is free. Verified members can comment and reply for $2 a month.

The conversation.

Loading comments…

Keep your curiosity going.